Course Syllabus

 

Psychology of Political Behavior

DIS Logo

Teeter Totter illustration.jpeg

Semester & Location:

Spring 2020 - DIS Stockholm

Type & Credits:

Elective Course - 3 credits

Faculty Members:

Steve Turner

Program Director:

Lars Rossen

Email: lro@dis.dk

Time & Place:

Tuesdays and Fridays, 10.05-11.25

Room #1D410

 

Description of Course

This course emphasizes the psychological mechanisms affecting political reasoning and behavior, such as how psychological biases affect our cognition, information-processing, and political behavior. Comparisons between U.S. and Swedish political contexts are explored, specifically examining how the political mind is embedded in social frameworks. This course is based on theory and research from the field of political psychology, an interdisciplinary academic field studying the relationships between psychological and political processes.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this course, students are expected

  • To understand and describe principles and concepts related to political cognition such as information processing, decision-making, and perception.
  • To understand the ways in which moral psychology shapes political orientation and conflict
  • To apply theory and analyze political phenomena in daily life from a psychological perspective.
  • To critically evaluate scientific methods and research within the field of political psychology.
  • To contrast and consider cultural differences between American and European political contexts.
  • To understand the dominant political ideologies in Sweden and how they differ from the US
  • To develop a nuanced understanding of how evolutionary forces - both biological and cultural - influence our political orientations and behavior
  • To further develop essential skills – in analytical thinking and in both oral and written presentation - that are vital not only in navigating academic studies, but in flourishing in the game of life.

Faculty

Steve Turner

DIS Stockholm Faculty

M.A. in Political Sociology, Harvard University. Extensive teaching experience in comparative politics, globalization, the welfare state, and multiculturalism. Works as a Leadership Consultant, bringing the lessons from modern psychology and neuroscience to the world of business. Also an avid squash player and kayaker. With DIS since 2016.

Readings

Core Readings

Books

Haidt, J. (2012). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Vintage.

Tuschman, A.  (2013) Our Political Nature: The Evolutionary Origins of What Divides Us.  Prometheus.

Supplementary Readings

Hawkins, S. ,  Yudkin, D.   Juan-Torres, M.  (2018) Hidden Tribes: A Study of America's Polarized Landscape. More In Common

Huddy, L., Sears, D. & Levy. J. (2013) Introduction: Theoretical Foundations of Political Psychology.  The Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (2 ed.) Edited by Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears, and Jack S. Levy

Kolbert, E. (2017, February 27). Why facts don’t change our minds: New Discoveries about the human mind show the limitations of reason. The New Yorker

Rauch, J. (2016, July/August). How American Politics Went insane. The Atlantic.

Sidanius, J. & Kurzban, R. (2013). Chapter 7: Toward an Evolutionary Informed Political Psychology.he Oxford Handbook of Political Psychology (2 ed.) Edited by Leonie Huddy, David O. Sears, and Jack S. Levy

Movies and other media

An Interview with Avi Tuschman

Link

Haidt, J. (2014, November 21). The Moral Psychology of Political Polarization: Many Causes and a Few Possible Responses [Lecture].  www.youtube.com/watch?v=1OnTTWkAv_E

Yuval Noah Harari - The Bright Side of Nationalism

Link

Robert Sapolsky: The Biology of Good and Evil

Link

Haidt, J. (2008). The moral roots of liberals and conservatives. [TED talk]. Retrieved from  www.ted.com/talks/jonathan_haidt_on_the_moral_mind

Haidt, J. (2016, August 9). Why the Centre Cannot Hold in America, Europe, and Psychology [Blogpost and video lecture.] Retrieved from http://heterodoxacademy.org/2016/08/09/why-the-centre-cannot-hold/

Zimbardo, P. (2008, February). The Psychology of Evil [TED talk]. Retrieved from http://www.ted.com/talks/philip_zimbardo_on_the_psychology_of_evil

Recommended Readings

Articles

Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences38, e130.

Jost, J. T. (2006). The end of the end of ideology. American Psychologist, 61(7), 651.

Iyengar, S., & Westwood, S. J. (2015). Fear and loathing across party lines: New evidence on group polarization. American Journal of Political Science,59(3), 690-707.

PEW Research Center. (n.d.). Political Polarization in the American Public.

Field Studies

Field Study 1 – Visiting the Swedish Parliament, February 12

  • Topic: Understanding Swedish political system and contemporary political context, focusing on government and the legal system.
  • Objective: To learn how the Swedish government and parliamentary system works, with both historical and contemporary perspectives. To identify and understand cultural differences between the political system in Sweden and the US.
  • Description: We will visit the Swedish parliament, where we will get a tour of the parliament building as well as meeting with a Swedish MP.

Field Study 2 - TBA, April 29

Approach to Teaching

My approach to teaching is based on a core assumption: Learning is a collective endeavour in which the contribution of each individual has an impact on how much is learned overall. Lectures can serve a valuable purpose both in providing useful information and in stimulating creative thought. But genuine learning takes place only when the student takes an active role –in reading carefully, thinking critically, in raising questions and objections, and in listening to others. It is only through engaged dialogue that we have the capacity to enrich our understanding of the world. My expectation is that students will actively engage in the learning process, both inside and outside the classroom.   

The course utilizes a variety of pedagogical methods, including lectures, discussions, student presentations, policy simulations, and study visits. There is a strong emphasis on discussion and student participation. Everyone is expected to not only complete the readings for each class, but to come to class well prepared to engage in discussion.

Attendance at all lectures and field studies is mandatory.

Note that it is important to check your e-mail and DIS Canvas regularly since outlines, exam info etc. will be distributed here.

Expectations of the Students

Students are expected to have done the readings and come prepared with relevant questions and notes for each class. This will give us material to generate conversation. When responding to questions in class, make reference to our readings to support the points you are making. Students are expected to challenge themselves and their worldviews with an investigative mindset and curiosity, seeking to understand the topics at hand as well as how they relate to themselves as individuals and the world around them.  

Grading

Methods of Evaluation

How evaluated

Due Date

Percentage of grade

Pre-class Preparation

Canvas Quiz

Ongoing

30%

Attendance/Engaged participation

Individual

Ongoing

20%

Mid-term Take Home Exam

Individual

March 8

25%

Final Exam

Individual

May 7th

25%

Total

 

 

100%

Pre-class Prep (30%):

Prior to most class sessions, you will complete a short Canvas quiz based on the readings and concepts addressed in class. 

Attendance/Engaged Participation (20%):

Your participation grade reflects the importance of being active in this course, which relies in great part on the reflections, discussions, and exercises in class. Students are expected to come prepared with relevant questions for discussion pertaining to the topic, as well as making contributions with relevant analytical insights and critical evaluations. The participation grade also takes into consideration punctuality.

Attending class earns a grade of 85; Raising questions and engaging in discussions earns additional points

Mid-term Take Home Exam (25%)

There will be a take-home exam covering the theories and concepts that have been discussed so far in the course.

Final Exam (25%)

To be eligible for a passing grade in this class you must complete all of the assigned work.

 

Academic Regulations  

Please make sure to read the Academic Regulations on the DIS website. There you will find regulations on:

 

 

DIS - Study Abroad in Scandinavia - www.DISabroad.org

 

Course Summary:

Date Details Due