Course Syllabus
Semester & Location: |
Spring 2025 - DIS Copenhagen |
Type & Credits: |
Elective Course - 3 credits |
Major Disciplines: |
Political Science, International Relations, Environmental Studies |
Prerequisites: |
None |
Faculty Members: |
Steen Kjærgaard, Camilla T.N. Sørensen Students use the canvas inbox to contact. |
Time & Place: | Tuesdays & Fridays 1315-1435. Classroom: N7-D10 |
Course description
Given the tremendous effects of climate change and the resurgence of geopolitics, the Arctic region is undergoing rapid transformation. Viewed through the lens of national security and military strategy, it is highly dynamic and unpredictable carrying significant implications, not only for the Arctic people and states, but also for the global community.
As the climate changes, the Arctic becomes more accessible, presenting new opportunities and challenges. The region is rich in valuable mineral and energy resources, and the emergence of new sea routes holds the promise of shorter travel distances between Europe and Asia. These changes also significantly impact research activities and military operations.
Since the end of the Cold War, the region has not figured high on the great powers’ national security agenda nor been a military priority. This has made it possible for the smaller Arctic states to take the lead in strengthening Arctic multilateral cooperation. The key Arctic governance institution – the Arctic Council – was established in 1996 to promote coordination and cooperation among the Arctic states and other stakeholders, especially on Arctic climate research, Arctic environmental protection, and Arctic coast guard assistance. Despite growing security tension outside the Arctic, the eight Arctic states – the U.S., Russia, Canada, Norway, Finland, Iceland, Sweden, and the Kingdom of Denmark – have for years managed to guard Arctic cooperation. They have had a joint interest in both keeping Arctic governance in the hands of Arctic states and maintaining the region as a low-tension area.
However, this 'Arctic exceptionalism' has come under increasing pressure in recent years. The great powers – the U.S., Russia, and China – are showing a growing interest in the region, which is also moving up on their national security agenda. This shift – combined with the deteriorating relations between the U.S. and the broader West and NATO on one side and China and Russia on the other – is leading to growing mistrust and security tension as well as military build-up, which complicates, if not outright undermines, the efforts of smaller Arctic states to guard Arctic cooperation.
Since the Russian full-blown invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, the Arctic Council has thus been put on pause, and all the militaries of the Arctic states – and other NATO member states – are increasing their focus on the region further fuelling the military build-up and the number of military exercises in the region. While a large-scale military confrontation in the Arctic is unlikely, there is a growing risk of clashes and conflicts caused by unintended accidents or intentional hybrid activities escalating.
Geopolitics increasingly frames how the Arctic states approach the region, which also brings with it new dynamics and challenges within several of the Arctic states and in particular those that have strong Arctic indigenous communities. The legitimacy and interpretation of legal frameworks, e.g., treaties and conventions, are increasingly up for debate both among and within the Arctic states as well as outside of the region.
This course offers an introduction to Arctic geopolitics following the Russian invasion of Ukraine, focusing on how the growing security tension and military conflict between the great powers manifest in the region. We set out to explore the complexities between global, regional, and national security dynamics and military concerns and priorities by applying various concepts and theories from Political Science, International Relations (IR,) and Military Strategy, as well as historical knowledge and cases.
Instructors
Steen Kjærgaard, Master of Arts in International Security from the University of Leicester (UK) 2018. Military officer. Military Academy, Bachelor 1996. Joint Command and Staff College masters degree, 2010. Works at the Royal Danish Defense College, as a military analyst. Academic focus on strategic issues such as military security, Arctic security, and International Law. Served in the Danish Defense Intelligence Service. With DIS since 2018.
Camilla T. N. Sørensen, Doctor (PhD) in Political Science from the University of Copenhagen in 2008. Currently works at the Royal Danish Defense College as an associate professor within international security and military strategy with a specific focus on China, East Asia, and the Arctic. Has solid experience in planning and conducting courses on a broad range of topics related to international politics and security in various and often very diverse settings. With DIS since 2023.
Learning objectives of the course
Through this course, students will acquire:
An understanding of key issues, challenges, and developments in Arctic security and governance, including:
- The relevance of the Arctic in the current geopolitical context.
- The evolving Arctic security context with a focus on the effect of climate change and the return of geopolitics.
- The politics and strategies of the great powers, i.e. the U.S., China, and Russia, in the Arctic.
- The development of the Arctic governance regime with a focus on the Arctic Council.
- The end of Arctic low-tension i.e. Arctic exceptionalism, due to growing security tension and great power competition.
- The challenges and opportunities for smaller Arctic states.
- The Kingdom of Denmark, including the U.S. presence in Greenland over time.
Competence:
Upon completion of the course, the students should be able to draw on historical knowledge and cases as well as concepts and theories from Political Science, International Relations (IR), and Military Strategy to critically analyze and evaluate current events and future perspectives related to Arctic geopolitics.
Structure
The course is structured over seven themes:
- Introduction to the Arctic Geopolitics – defining the Arctic and defining Geopolitics
- The opening or changing Arctic under pressure with a focus on the effect of climate change on e.g. resource extraction and shipping routes.
- Arctic security in the context of great power competition – the policies and strategies of the great powers.
- Arctic security in the context of great power competition – the implications for the smaller Arctic states, including their policies and strategies
- End of Arctic low-tension or Arctic exceptionalism – the evolving Arctic governance regime and the role of non-Arctic governance regimes and institutions
- Current key developments and cases, i.e., growing strategic cooperation between Russia and China, NATO's evolving role in the Arctic, intensifying controversy over Svalbard, and the evolving role of the EU in the Arctic
- The Kingdom of Denmark – Denmark, Greenland, and the Faroe Islands – as an Arctic state and the changing role and influence of the U.S.
Readings
The readings comprise book chapters, academic articles, policy reports, and news articles. There is no textbook to pick up during the arrivals workshop.
Full list:
- Arts, Sophie, Vulnerable, Strategically, Critical and Underfunded, GMF, July 26, 2024, Vulnerable, Strategically Critical, and Underfunded | German Marshall Fund of the United States (gmfus.org)
- Ayaydin, Eda, "Under the Shadow of Absolute Sovereignty: Exploring Conditional Sovereignty in the Case of Svalbard Geopolitics." Ocean and Coastal Law Journal, Vol. 29, No. 2, January 2024, Under the Shadow of Absolute Sovereignty: Exploring Conditional Sovereignty in the Case of Svalbard Geopolitics (maine.edu)
- Bloom, Evan T., "A Second Trump Presidency Will Impact the Arctic," Barents Observer, July 10, 2024, A second Trump Presidency will impact the Arctic | The Independent Barents Observer (thebarentsobserver.com)
- Byers, Michael. "Crises and international cooperation: An Arctic case study." International Relations 31:4, 2017: 375-402.
- Congressional Research Service, Changes in the Arctic: Background and Issues for Congress, August 7, 2024, R41153 (congress.gov) (READ pp. 1-6)
- Conley, Heather A., Sophie Arts, Bonnie S. Glaser, Kristine Berzina & Jaine Archambeau, A New Era of Arctic Geopolitics. GMF, May 2024, A New Era of Arctic Geopolitics.pdf (gmfus.org)
- Detsch, Jack, "NATO's New Map" Foreign Policy, July 27, 2024, NATO’s New Map – Foreign Policy
- Devyatkin, Pavel, "Can Arctic Cooperation be restored" Arctic Institute, 28 March 2023, Can Arctic Cooperation be Restored? | The Arctic Institute – Center for Circumpolar Security Studies
- Dodds, Klaus, "It is smart to be geopolitical', Geopolitics: A Very Short Introduction, 1rd edn, Very Short Introductions (Oxford, 2007; online edn, Oxford Academic), pp. 4-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198830764.003.0001,
- EU, The Arctic Policy of the EU: A Stronger EU Engagement for a Peaceful, Sustainable and Prosperous Arctic, 13 October 2021, Joint Communication on a stronger EU engagement for a peaceful, sustainable and prosperous Arctic.pdf.pdf (europa.eu)
- Forsberg, Tuomas, "Finland and Swedens Road to NATO," Current History, March 2023, CURH122842_02_Forsberg 89..94 (tuni.fi)
- Godnell, Rachell & Benjamin Jensen, NATO and the Arctic, CSIS, July 10, 2024, NATO and the Arctic (csis.org)
- Gordon, Chris, "NORAD Fighters Intercept Russian, Chinese Bombers Near Alaska." Air and Space Force Magazine, July 24, 2024, NORAD Fighters Intercept Russian, Chinese Bombers Near Alaska (airandspaceforces.com)
- Gricius, Gabriella "A Decolonial Approach to Arctic Security and Sovereignty", Arctic Yearbook, 2021, pp. 1-21, 4_AY2021_Gricius.pdf (arcticyearbook.com)
- Humberty, Malte. Russia Amends Arctic Policy Prioritizing 'National Interest' and Removing Cooperation within Arctic Council, High North, 23 February 2023, Russia Amends Arctic Policy Prioritizing ‘National Interest’ and Removing Cooperation Within Arctic Council (highnorthnews.com)
- Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC), Declaration on Sovereignty in the Arctic, 2009, Signed-Inuit-Sovereignty-Declaration-11x17-1.pdf (inuitcircumpolar.com)
- Inuit Circumpolar Council (ICC), Position Paper on Arctic Council: We must strengthen and safeguard the Arctic Council, 13 July 2024, Inuit Circumpolar Council issues position paper on Arctic Council: We must strengthen and safeguard the Arctic Council | Inuit Circumpolar Council Canada
- Jonassen, Trine. "Arctic Council Chairmanship: Norway Knows how to do it" High North News, 31 January 2023, Arctic Council Chairmanship: “Norway Knows How to Do It” (highnorthnews.com)
- Koivurova & Holiencin (2017): "Demilitarisation and neutralisation of Svalbard: how has the Svalbard regime been able to meet the changing security realities during almost 100 years of existence?". Polar Record 53, Cambridge University Press: pp.131-142 Link
- Patey, Luke, "Managing US-China Rivalry in the Arctic. Small states can be players in great power competition." DIIS Policy Brief, October 2020, Managing US–China rivalry in the Arctic (diis.dk)
- Rahbek-Clemmensen & Henriksen (2017): The ‘Greenland Card’ – the importance of the Arctic for Danish influence in the US. Center for Military Studies, University of Copenhagen.
- Rahbek-Clemmensen, Jon. "U.S. Free Association with Greenland: A Bad Deal" War on the Rocks, 9 January 2025, U.S. Free Association with Greenland: A Bad Deal - War on the Rocks
- Staun, Jørgen & Camilla T. N. Sørensen, "Incompatible Strategic Cultures Limit Russian-Chinese Strategic
Cooperation in the Arctic." Scandinavian Journal of Military Studies, Vol. 6, No. 1, pp. 24–39, Incompatible Strategic Cultures Limit Russian-Chinese Strategic Cooperation in the Arctic (sjms.nu) - Stephen, Adam & Andreas Raspotnik, The Arctic Institute’s 2023 Series on the EU’s Arctic Policy – Final Remarks, The Arctic Institute, 10 October 2023, The Arctic Institute’s 2023 Series on the European Union's Arctic Policy - Final Remarks | The Arctic Institute – Center for Circumpolar Security Studies
- Sørensen, Camilla T. N. “The ice dragon – Chinese interests in the Arctic.” Strategic Analysis, No. 5, 2019, pp. 1-8, https://www.hybridcoe.fi/news/strategic-analysis-5-2019-the-ice-dragon-chinese-interests-in-the-arctic/
- Tatlow, Didi Kirsten. "China's Expanding Arctic Ambitions Challenge the U.S. and NATO," Newsweek Magazine, July 21, 2024; China's Expanding Arctic Ambitions Challenge the U.S. and NATO - Newsweek
- Thorhallson, Baldur, "Studying Small States. A Review." Small States & Territories, Vol. 1, No. 1, 2028, pp. 17-34, SST-MS9-Thorallsson-review-6-25Mar2018 (hi.is)
- Trellevik, Amund (2020): Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs is crystal clear: Will not enter into dialogue with Russia about Norwegian Territory : https://www.highnorthnews.com/en/norwegian-mfa-crystal-clear-will-not-enter-dialogue-russia-about-norwegian-territory
- Wall, Colin & Njord Wegge. The Russian Arctic Threat. Consequences of the Ukraine War. CSIS Brief, January 2023, 230125_Wall_RussianArcticThreat_0.pdf (csis-website-prod.s3.amazonaws.com)
- Walt, Stephen M. (1998): International Relations: One world, many theories. Foreign Policy, Spring 1998; 110. (Available on Canvas).
- Østhagen, Andreas. The Arctic after Russia's invasion of Ukraine: The increased risk of conflict and hybrid threats, Hybrid CoE Report, No. 18, May 2023 (20 pages), 20230510-Hybrid-CoE-Paper-18-Arctic-after-Ukraine-WEB.pdf (hybridcoe.fi)
- Østhagen, Andreas. Five Misconceptions in Arctic Security and Geopolitics, Arctic Institute, 1 June 2023 (9 pages), Five Misconceptions in Arctic Security and Geopolitics | The Arctic Institute – Center for Circumpolar Security Studies
- Østhagen, Andreas, "Svalbard and Geopolitics: A Need for Clarity", The Arctic Institute, 25 July 2024, Svalbard and Geopolitics: A Need for Clarity | The Arctic Institute – Center for Circumpolar Security Studies
- Østhagen, Andreas & Peter Wilhelm Lund Linde, Why Norway and the Kingdom of Denmark should work closer together vis-á-vis the United States on security in the Arctic, Wilson Center: Polar Points, July 6, 2022, No. 13 | Why Norway and the Kingdom of Denmark should work closer together vis-à-vis the United States on security in the Arctic | Wilson Center
- U.S. Department of Defence, Arctic Strategy, Washington, June 2024, 2024 Department of Defense Arctic Strategy
- *A Quick Start Guide to the Law of the Seas in the Arctic, The Arctic Institute, TAI-Quick-Start-to-UNCLOS.pdf (thearcticinstitute.org)
- Podcast: PolitikWissen: Powi Lecture #11: Small States and Grand Strategy on Apple Podcasts
Approach to teaching
Class sessions will include short lectures by the course instructor, academic discussions, group work, guest lectures, field studies, creative assignments, and simulation games.
Our classes will follow the "flipped classroom" method - see https://bokcenter.harvard.edu/flipped-classrooms (link to an external site).
Come well-prepared and willing to share your knowledge and insights.
Expectations of the students
It is expected that all students actively participate in class: do the readings for each class; bring notes and questions for the course instructor and other students; and actively and responsibly participate in their study group, class discussions, and other activities.
Academic Regulations
Please make sure to read the Academic Regulations on the DIS website. There you will find regulations on:
DIS - Study Abroad in Scandinavia - www.DISabroad.org
Course Summary:
Date | Details | Due |
---|---|---|