Course Syllabus

Philosophy of Technology and Human Values 

DIS Logo

Infinity-Mirrored-Room-1-1.jpg

Semester & Location:

 Fall 2021 - DIS Stockholm

Type & Credits:

Elective Course - 3 credits

Major Disciplines:

Philosophy, Ethics

Prerequisite(s):

None

Faculty Member:

Jan Holmgaard - janholmgaard@hotmail.com 

Program Director:

Andreas Brøgger - abr@dis.dk  

Academic Support:

academics@disstockholm.se

Time & Place:

Mondays & Thursdays, 13:15 - 14.35 | 1E-509

Description of Course

In our age, it is undeniable that human beings are technological creatures. Techné, that is, artful craftsmanship, has increasingly been enhancing our experiences, fulfilling our desires, and broadening our abilities, both on a large scale and in the daily lives of individuals. Do we control technology or does it control us? Is technology part of nature or an instrument to human ends? How can we respond critically to the use and development of technology? In this course, we examine such pressing questions from specifically Scandinavian, ethical, social, environmental, and philosophical perspectives.

Learning Objectives

Among the goals of this course are to: (1) gain a philosophical understanding of the role of technology in the human drama, specifically as an ethical category; (2) relate our own particular lived experiences to universal philosophical concepts that illuminate the human relationship to technology; (3) acquire skills in navigating challenging philosophical texts; (4) gain abilities in nuancing and articulating justifications for our own views; and (5) develop methodological tools for contributing to thought and action related to the place of technology in today’s world.

Faculty

Jan Holmgaard, PhD in Comparative Literature, Stockholm University. Associate Professor at the Department of Culture and Aesthetics, Stockholm University. Formerly visiting researcher at Oxford University and The Søren Kierkegaard Research Centre, Copenhagen University. Teaches literature and philosophy at DIS Stockholm. With DIS since 2017.

Readings

Textbook

Ide, Don. Technology and the Lifeworld: From Garden to Earth (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1990).

Texts on Canvas

  • Jean Baudrillard’s “The Precession of the Simulacra” in Simulacra and Simulation (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan 1994).
  • Hubert L. Dreyfus’s “Anonymity versus Commitment: The Dangers of Education on the Internet” Educational Philosophy and Theory 34 (2002).
  • Hubert L. Dreyfus’ “Heidegger on Gaining a Free Relationship to Technology: What Heidegger is Not Saying,” in Readings in the Philosophy of Technology (Rowman & Littlefield, 2004).
  • Hubert L. Dreyfus’ On the Internet (New York: Routledge, 2001), pp 49-71, pp 72-88.
  • Umberto Eco’s “Reports from the Global Village,” in Travels in Hyperreality (San Diego, CA: Harcourt, 1986).
  • Jacques Ellul’s The Technological Society (New York: Alfred Knopf, 1964), pp 3-22.
  • Michel Foucault’s “The Eye of Power,” in Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings (New York: Pantheon, 1980).
  • Sarah Franklin’s “Stem Cells R Us: Emerging Forms of Life and the Global Biological,” in Global Assemblages: Technology, Politics, and Ethics as Anthropological Problems (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2005).
  • Francis Fukuyama’s Our Post-Human Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution (London: Picador, 2002), pp 41-56, pp 181-194.
  • Jürgen Habermas’ “An Argument against Human Cloning,” in The PostNational Constellation: Political Essays (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2001).
  • Martin Heidegger’s “The Question Concerning Technology,” in Basic Writings (New York: Harper & Row, 1977).
  • James Hughes’ “Contradictions from the Enlightenment Roots of Transhumanism,” Journal of Medicine & Philosophy 35 (2010).
  • Eric Kluitenberg’s “On the Archaeology of Imaginary Media,” in Media Archeology: Approaches, Applications, and Implications (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 2011).
  • Pierre Lemonnier’s Mundane Objects: Materiality and Non-Verbal Communication (New York: Routledge, 2016), pp 21-43, pp 99-118.
  • Jussi Parikka’s “Media Theory and the New Materialism,” in What is Media Archaeology? (Cambridge: Polity, 2012).
  • Bryan Pfaffenberger’s “Social Anthropology of Technology,” Annual Review of Anthropology: Vol. 21 (1992).
  • Christine Rosen’s “Virtual Friendship and the New Narcissism,” The New Atlantis (2007)
  • Roger Scruton’s “Hiding Behind the Screen,” The New Atlantis (2010).
  • John Durham Peters, "God and Google", The Marvelous Clouds (Chicaco, The University of Chicago Press 2015), pp 315-346.
  • Bernard Stiegler´s Technics and Time 1, (Stanford, Stanford University Press 1998), pp 1-19
  • Ellen Ullman’s Close to the Machine: On Technophilia and its Discontents (New York: Farar, Strauss & Giroux, 2012), pp 1-16, pp 17-38.
  • Slavoj Zizek’s “Of Cells and Selves,” in The Zizek Reader (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell, 2009).

Approach to Teaching

I believe that teaching is a passion. Each session, seminar or lecture is an opportunity not only to present facts, knowledge, and analytical perspectives, but to engage in dialogue with students on important literary, ideological, cultural, and existential questions and topics. I always encourage students to challenge themselves and to engage in critical thinking, whereby preconceived ideas and one´s own prejudices are questioned and put into context.

Expectations of Students

Students are expected to have done the reading for each class and to come prepared with notes and questions for the class to discuss. Engaged participation is part of the evaluation and grading of the course. It also makes the sessions so much more interesting and versatile. It is vital that the students engage in an ongoing critical dialogue based on the required texts. Engaged participation is also extended to include an oral presentation in class. Furthermore, students are expected to develop their writing abilities and their analytical approach to literature. During the course, students are expected to hand in two papers, as well as a final paper.

Evaluation

Students will be evaluated based on overall acquired skills, from demonstrating a basic understanding of facts and knowledge, over a comprehensive understanding of philosophical and theoretical concepts and contexts, to a fully developed critical approach to important and complex philosophical questions dealing with technology and human values. Students will be evaluated based on the following: the engaged participation in class, the oral presentation in class, two written assignments, and the final paper.

Grading

Assignment

Percent

Participation

10%

Oral presentation

10%

Paper 1

20%

Paper 2 

20%

Final paper

40%

Participation 10%

The student is expected to attend all sessions, to come prepared for each session, and to participate actively in all discussions during class.

Oral presentation 10%

Each student will choose one text from the course syllabus belonging to one of the sessions during the course. The student is expected to introduce some major concepts and ideas from the text, present these to class and to lead the first part of the session in an informal, yet creative way (lasting for about 20 minutes). 

Paper 1 20%

The student is expected to write an essay (4-5 pages) on a major theme from the first part of the course. Further instructions will appear as the assignment is handed out.

Paper 2 20%

The student is expected to write a second essay (4-5 pages) on a major theme  from the second or third part of the course. Further instructions will appear as the assignment is handed out.

Final paper 40%

The student is expected to write a final paper (8 pages), where several major themes and ideas from the course are discussed. Further instructions will appear as the assignment is handed out.

All assignment instructions will include detailed information regarding academic requirements.  

COVID-19 Statement

We all have a collective responsibility to avoid the spread of COVID-19 at DIS. Throughout this semester, please monitor yourself carefully for symptoms of COVID-19 (dry cough, high temperature, breathing difficulties, sore throat, headache, muscle pain, loss of smell/taste). If you experience any of these symptoms, please stay home and contact the DIS emergency phone. The respondent will coordinate with Academics at DIS Stockholm, who will in turn contact your individual faculty. If you are otherwise well but isolating due to possible exposure or mild symptoms, it is your responsibility to keep up with your coursework - we will organize hybrid classes for you to join via Zoom. If you are unwell due to COVID-19 and unable to attend class or study, your absence will be excused. Your faculty will work with you to ensure you are able to make up missed course content due to illness. You are still responsible for completing any missed work. 

Academic Regulations  

Please make sure to read the Academic Regulations on the DIS website. There you will find regulations on: 

 

DIS - Study Abroad in Scandinavia - www.DISabroad.org

 

Course Summary:

Date Details Due